PerCP vs PerCPCy5.5 (or PE-Cy5.5) on FACS Aria or LSR II
mbigos at gladstone.ucsf.edu
Tue Mar 2 20:49:49 EST 2004
>We all know that a few years ago, BD introduced PerCP-Cy5.5 tandems,
>with the claim that they perform better on the jet-in-air sorters;
>it is not my intent to discuss that.
>Instead, I want to discuss which reagents are preferred on the Aria
>(or LSR-II) equipped with an octagon on the 488 laser and a trigon
>on the 633 laser. Specifically, the list I'd like us to consider is
>PerCP, PerCP-Cy5.5, and PE-Cy5.5. For the moment, I'd also like to
>exclude from the conversation attempts to simultaneously use a Cy5.5
>tandem between a Cy5 and a Cy7 tandem (unless some insists, for a
>REALLY good reason).
>My first order expectation is that of the three labels (PerCP,
>PerCP-Cy5.5, or PE-Cy5.5), the preferred one on the Aria would be
>PerCP, for one simple reason -- the Cy5.5 moiety on the tandems will
>be excited by the red laser and will therefore require large
>cross-beam compensation in the channel that we are currently using
>Alexa680 or Alexa700. In contrast, the required crossbeam
>compensation for PerCP will be substantially less.
Hi John -
Since you are using digital electronics (on an Aria) whether or not
the compensations needed are "cross-beam" or come from the same laser
is immaterial. It is all handled in the same manner by the same
Unfortunately there is a good reason for considering other colors.
And that is because, depending upon whic ones you use, there may be
spectral overlap into the PerCp measurement channel. This will be
especially true of PE-TR, and is relevant because out of the three
dyes considered, PerCp is the dimmest, followed by PerCp-Cy5.5,
followed by PE-Cy5.5. And of course the emission spectra of PerCP and
PE-Cy5 are too close to be able to independently measure both dyes,
while the Cy5.5 tandems can be measured along with PE-Cy5.
The Cy5.5 signal does show up strongly in the red excited channels,
but the PerCp, although less, is not insignificant either. So you
have a balancing act to do. You will obtain better results with the
red laser excited dyes by using PerCP rather than a tandem Cy5.5.
However you will obtain worse results on that primary channel with
PerCP. And, of course, the PE tandems will show up on a number of
other blue laser channels, while PerCp only has overlap with the
longer wavelength emissions (PE-Cy7). Thus, to me, the "correct"
answer to your question is: it depends upon what your are trying to
measure. It may make no difference at all which fluorochrome you use,
or it may be quite significant.
If you have an Aria now with a low power 488 nm laser, you also need
to consider, if the panel you are designing will have a long
lifetime, that at some point in the future you may want to upgrade to
a higher power one. A 100 mW blue laser is a drop-in replacement and
provides substantial signal increases compared to the stock low-power
blue laser. We will be presenting some date demonstrating this at
>John D. Altman
>Emory Vaccine Research Center
>954 Gatewood Road
>Atlanta, GA 30329
>jaltman at rmy.emory.edu
>Office Phone: (404) 727-5981
>Lab Phone: (404) 727-8914
>FAX: (404) 727-8199
>Assistant Phone: (404) 727-8778
More information about the Cytometry