CBA versus flowcytomix
richard.konz at pharma.novartis.com
Wed Jun 9 09:58:08 EST 2004
I've been using the BD Biosciences CBA kits for quite some time and have
been very pleased with the overall ease of running samples and analyzing
on the CBA software. I have been using the CBA Human TH1/TH2 Kit II
[IL-2,4,6,10, TNFa, IFNg] kit for the past six months to evaluate
activated T cell cytokine
production and was extremely pleased with the sensitivity and
reproducibility from assay to assay and kit to kit.
Contact me directly if you need further information. Hope this helps.
Richard F. Konz, Jr.
Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc.
HT Flow Cytometry Facility
100 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
email: richard.konz at pharma.novartis.com
Manuel Comabella Lopez <mcomabel at vhebron.net>
06/08/2004 10:12 AM
To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry at flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
Subject: CBA versus flowcytomix
We are highly interested in setting up the determination of several
cytokines in supernatants from cell cultures. We are awared of two
commercially available flow cytometry based kits that work on a
way: the CBA from Becton Dickinson, and the Flowcytomix from Bender
MedSystems (Innogenetics). Could anyone enlighten us about which one
Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit
Vall Hebron Hospital
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the Cytometry