Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
rleif at rleif.com
Wed Aug 5 10:37:41 EST 1998
From: Bob Leif, Ph.D.
There are 2 very good reasons NOT to use the term FACS. 1) I believe that
FACS belongs to B.D. 2) It stands for Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter. If
the instrument is an analyzer, it is a total misnomer.
From: Tom Campbell [mailto:tac at isolab.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 1998 11:45 AM
To: Cytometry Mailing List
Greetings. I am reviewing a paper which uses the term "FACS" to describe
general flow cytometry protocols. It is my impression that "FACS" is a
copyrighted term, describing the sorting of cells, but much like "Xeroxed",
etc., has become a generic term for flow cytometry protocols. Am I right?
Should this person be allowed to use this term, or should it be changed?
Tom Campbell, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
More information about the Cytometry