Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. rleif at rleif.com
Wed Aug 5 10:37:41 EST 1998

From: Bob Leif, Ph.D.
To: cyto-inbox

There are 2 very good reasons NOT to use the term FACS. 1) I believe that
FACS belongs to B.D. 2) It stands for Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter. If
the instrument is an analyzer, it is a total misnomer.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Tom Campbell [mailto:tac at isolab.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, August 04, 1998 11:45 AM
To:	Cytometry Mailing List
Subject:	"FACS"

Greetings.  I am reviewing a paper which uses the term "FACS" to describe
general flow cytometry protocols.  It is my impression that "FACS" is a
copyrighted term, describing the sorting of cells, but much like "Xeroxed",
etc., has become a generic term for flow cytometry protocols.  Am I right?
 Should this person be allowed to use this term, or should it be changed?

Tom Campbell, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Wallac, Inc
Akron, OH

More information about the Cytometry mailing list