dgerard at gmail.com
Fri Sep 22 16:40:36 EDT 2006
On 22/09/06, Jon Awbrey <jawbrey at att.net> wrote:
> The problem at WP was not with NPOV. It was that once an article got any kind of
> official notice from the "activist subcabal of the administrative cabal" (ASOTAC),
> it immediately fell under the ban of the House Point Of View (HPOV), a POV so
> uncritical and so unreflective that it could not even see that it was a POV.
Y'know, I have no idea at all of what in concrete terms you're talking
about. Could you please give examples of the articles and discussions
you have in mind that demonstrate the above?
(I suppose I'm saying "cite, please.")
More information about the Citizendium-l